TEst Logo
TEst Logo
  • Home
  • Train Problems
    • The 12 Big Train Problems
    • 1. Eroding Beach & Bluffs
    • 2. Costly Del Mar Tunnel
    • 3. $$$San Clemente Tunnel
    • 4. Low Ridership
    • 5. Low Freight Volume
    • 6. Beach Destruction
    • 7. Not Equitable
    • 8. Doesn't Reduce Traffic
    • 9. Doesn't Reduce GHGs
    • 10. No Military Necessity
    • 11. Large Tunnel Impact
    • 12. Blocks Coast Access
  • Rail-To-Trail Benefits
    • 6 Benefits: Rail-to-Trail
    • 1. More Biking & Walking
    • 2.+Community/Urban Design
    • 3. Saves Beaches & Access
    • 4. Improves Safety
    • 5. Major Economic Benefit
    • 6. Fed/CA Funds Available
    • Rails-to-Trails.Org
  • About
    • About
    • Join Us. Contact Us.
    • News
  • Vision
    • What's Your Vision?
    • Rendering: Before & After
  • More
    • Home
    • Train Problems
      • The 12 Big Train Problems
      • 1. Eroding Beach & Bluffs
      • 2. Costly Del Mar Tunnel
      • 3. $$$San Clemente Tunnel
      • 4. Low Ridership
      • 5. Low Freight Volume
      • 6. Beach Destruction
      • 7. Not Equitable
      • 8. Doesn't Reduce Traffic
      • 9. Doesn't Reduce GHGs
      • 10. No Military Necessity
      • 11. Large Tunnel Impact
      • 12. Blocks Coast Access
    • Rail-To-Trail Benefits
      • 6 Benefits: Rail-to-Trail
      • 1. More Biking & Walking
      • 2.+Community/Urban Design
      • 3. Saves Beaches & Access
      • 4. Improves Safety
      • 5. Major Economic Benefit
      • 6. Fed/CA Funds Available
      • Rails-to-Trails.Org
    • About
      • About
      • Join Us. Contact Us.
      • News
    • Vision
      • What's Your Vision?
      • Rendering: Before & After
  • Sign In
  • Create Account

  • My Account
  • Signed in as:

  • filler@godaddy.com


  • My Account
  • Sign out

Signed in as:

filler@godaddy.com

  • Home
  • Train Problems
    • The 12 Big Train Problems
    • 1. Eroding Beach & Bluffs
    • 2. Costly Del Mar Tunnel
    • 3. $$$San Clemente Tunnel
    • 4. Low Ridership
    • 5. Low Freight Volume
    • 6. Beach Destruction
    • 7. Not Equitable
    • 8. Doesn't Reduce Traffic
    • 9. Doesn't Reduce GHGs
    • 10. No Military Necessity
    • 11. Large Tunnel Impact
    • 12. Blocks Coast Access
  • Rail-To-Trail Benefits
    • 6 Benefits: Rail-to-Trail
    • 1. More Biking & Walking
    • 2.+Community/Urban Design
    • 3. Saves Beaches & Access
    • 4. Improves Safety
    • 5. Major Economic Benefit
    • 6. Fed/CA Funds Available
    • Rails-to-Trails.Org
  • About
    • About
    • Join Us. Contact Us.
    • News
  • Vision
    • What's Your Vision?
    • Rendering: Before & After

Account


  • My Account
  • Sign out


  • Sign In
  • My Account

Problem #6. Beaches destroyed

  1.  In the past two years OCTA (the orange county rail authority) has dumped a 70-foot width of rip rap boulders along a stretch of south San Clemente shoreline to protect tracks caught between high surf and a sliding bluff. Today, the once popular beach is obliterated. 
  2. The agency’s 2021 Climate Study reveals its long term strategy to combat erosion and sea level rise – tons of rock, hard armoring, 5 foot walls and wave deflectors. 
  3. The problem with this plan is that it actually exacerbates erosion and devastates other stakeholders – SoCal’s vibrant tourism industry, its businesses, residents, and every person who seeks to enjoy our rapidly disappearing beaches. 
  4.  These practices must stop. A single agency, even a railroad, does not have the right to unmitigated destruction of our beaches – especially in the name of shoring up a doomed line with little freight and minimal, declining ridership. 
  5. The California Coastal Commission which reluctantly approved the emergency stabilizing measure must re-analyze the claims made by OCTA that 1) the train is a critical economic asset and 2) there is a realistic long term solution to remove the tracks from the beach.

Cypress Shores & Cottons Point 2012

Cypress Shores & Cottons Point 2012

Cypress Shores & Cottons Point 2012

Cypress Shores & Cottons Point 2023

Cypress Shores & Cottons Point 2012

Cypress Shores & Cottons Point 2012

References

  1. https://voiceofoc.org/2023/08/quirk-and-nelson-should-taxpayers-spend-5-million-per-rider-to-relocate-coastal-rail/

NEXT PROBLEM: #7 Not equitable

The Coaster Train predominantly serves those in the highest income brackets. Spending billions on such a lightly used line is deeply unfair and unjust.  LEARN MORE



Copyright © 2023 The Surf Line Trail - All Rights Reserved.

  • About
  • News